8 Perspectives.
One Decision.
Get comprehensive strategic analysis from 8 autonomous agents with distinct worldviews. From risk assessment to opportunity spotting.
They challenge each other. You get the full picture.
What You Get
Every debate produces actionable artifacts, not just a summary.
8 Independent Analyses
Each agent analyzes your decision blind, without seeing others' work. No groupthink. Pure divergent thinking.
Challenge & Defense
Each proposal faces 3 challengers who probe for weaknesses. Authors defend or concede. Verdicts are issued.
Ranked-Choice Winner
Single Transferable Vote finds the proposal that survives all elimination rounds. Not just most popular—most robust.
PDF Analysis Report
A comprehensive document with executive summary, stakeholder impact matrix, decision tree, and recommended resolution.
Points of Agreement
Discover what even opposing perspectives agree on. Often the most actionable insight comes from shared ground.
Information Gaps
Identifies what data is missing from your decision. What would you need to know to decide with confidence?
Choose Your Assembly
Different decisions need different perspectives. Select the council that matches your context.
Philosophical
Ethical reasoning and strategic worldviews. From ruthless realism to principled idealism.
Business
Stakeholder perspectives for corporate decisions. Investors, customers, regulators, employees.
Product
Product development lens. Technical architecture, user needs, growth vs. simplicity tradeoffs.
Prediction
Forecasting frameworks. Base rates, trend analysis, contrarian views, risk assessment.
How It Works
Describe your decision. Get a comprehensive analysis in minutes.
Describe
Enter your decision, question, or strategic dilemma. Enable web search for real-time data.
Analyze
8 agents with distinct worldviews analyze independently. No groupthink. Pure divergent thinking.
Debate
Proposals are challenged, defended, and refined. A moderator orchestrates based on tension levels.
Decide
Ranked-choice voting finds the most robust solution. Download a comprehensive PDF analysis report.
Secured victory by consolidating the centrist vote. The proposal's concrete metrics outweighed the Diplomat's abstract synthesis in the final round.
See Perspectives in Action
Real disagreement. Real insights.
"Is it viable to run a nation where all laws expire after 10 years and must be re-passed?"
"This is a filter for strength. Weak agencies that can't justify their existence deserve to die. Let the reauthorization battles begin—those with resources will survive."
"Imagine being a vulnerable person whose civil rights come up for debate every decade. The psychological terror of that uncertainty alone makes this system inhumane."
"A three-tiered system: foundational rights exempt, policy laws on 'presumption of continuity,' and emergency powers with hard 2-year expiration. Balance agility with stability."
"Jefferson was right: we shouldn't govern with 'the consent of the dead.' Every generation deserves to actively choose its laws, not inherit them by default."
Implement a three-tiered structure: permanently exempt foundational rights and criminal codes, subject emergency powers to strict two-year hard expiration, and apply a "presumption of continuity" review to standard policy laws. This hybrid balances governance agility with social stability.
Ready to see all sides?
Start your first multi-perspective debate
Already have an account? Sign in